Designed by Brent Wilcox Set in 11 point Minion by the Perseus Books Group Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Schwegel, Janet, 1959The baby name countdown : 140,000 popular and unusual baby names / Janet Schwegel. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Where those designations appear in this book and Da Capo Press was aware of a trademark claim, the designations have been printed in initial capital letters.
Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. To Bryan and Allison, who continue to give this work meaning, origin, and popularity. On March 7, Economic Affairs Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Azmin Ali said the Federal government would pay oil royalty to Kelantan after the proceedings of the withdrawal of the Kelantan government’s lawsuit against it and Petronas were settled.Countdown 140,000 Popular and Unusual Baby Names It claimed that a clause in the agreement stated that payments should be made twice a year, on or before March 1, and one more on or before September 1. In the suit, the state government said the Kelantan Petroleum Agreement signed on May 9, 1975, clearly stated that Petronas should pay in cash five per cent of oil revenue, either from exploration onshore or offshore. The Kelantan government had also sought costs and damages but did not specify the total amount from Petronas. In their statement of claim, the Kelantan government demanded that Petronas pay the outstanding and future cash payments for petroleum produced off the Kelantan coast, as set in their petroleum exploration agreement. However, the federal government then succeeded in its intervenor application and was named second defendant in the suit. On August 30, 2010, the Kelantan government as the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Petronas as the sole defendant. However, the hearing of the legal issues in the High Court is yet to be heard. The Federal Court made the ruling after dismissing the Kelantan government’s appeal against the Court of Appeal decision on April 26, 2012, which upheld the High Court’s decision directing that the civil suit be decided on points of law. In the ruling, a five-member panel of the Federal Court judges led by Justice Tan Sri Abdull Hamid Embong said there was no dispute of facts in the case so as to require the court to call witnesses to testify.
In July 2014, the Federal Court ruled that the suit should be remitted back to the High Court for a legal decision, as per Rule 14A of the Rules of Court 2012.
0 kommentar(er)
